VOCA Victims of Chiropractic Abuse
Chiropractic Patients Should Know Risks
Rick Green | Hartford Courant
December 29, 2009
 
Fit and 48 years old, Janet Levy went to a chiropractor to try to relieve a sore shoulder back in 2002. She nearly lost her life. A manipulation of her neck led to a stroke, then brain surgery, paralysis and years of therapy for the Woodbridge woman.

But that personal battle seems small compared with the struggle that Levy has undertaken to try to bring a basic reform to chiropractic care in Connecticut. Levy — who leads Victims of Chiropractic Abuse and is behind those ads on the sides of Connecticut Transit buses warning about chiropractors — and a handful of others have for years waged a failing effort to persuade the state legislature to enact legislation to force chiropractors to be a little more frank about what they do.

Now, the two sides will dramatically face off again Jan. 5 at 10 a.m. at a hearing at the Legislative Office Building in Hartford before the obscure state Board of Chiropractic Examiners, which has been asked to make a "declaratory ruling" on whether chiropractors should be required to inform their patients about the risks of neck manipulation. The outcome could affect chiropractors, and their patients, throughout the country.

No state currently requires that patients be warned of a stroke risk from cervical manipulation. I've written about this strange conflict surrounding "informed consent" a few times before, mostly because I can't understand why chiropractors — who are in the business of relieving pain — are trying to block something that would help their patients make educated decisions.

"I, unfortunately, was not given that information, which would have saved me two years out of my life," Levy says in testimony she has filed with the chiropractic board in advance of the hearing. "Chiropractors need to give their patients informed consent to tell them about the possibility of a stroke. … The controversy about how often it occurs should not be the primary concern. The severity of the outcome is what should matter."

The reality is, the risk of stroke is remote. But shouldn't patients at least know? Shouldn't they be told how to recognize a stroke in case a problem develops after a visit to the chiropractor? Not according to the various trade groups fighting Levy and another woman, Britt Harwe, who leads the Connecticut-based Chiropractic Stroke Awareness Group. The International Chiropractic Association says — remarkably — that informed consent wouldn't "best serve the public interest."

This, by the way, is the same group that thinks that patients should "be made aware of the possible adverse effects of vaccines upon a human body." In testimony submitted for the hearing, the association's George B. Curry assures the public that "the chiropractic profession maintains a vigilant watch on safety and clinical effectiveness issues." This is known as the fox guarding the henhouse. Another group, the Connecticut Chiropractic Council, says in testimony by David Steinberg that it is "not necessary to address the risk and/or possibility of the occurrence of a stroke or cervical artery dissection as a side effect."

This is because "no doctor is required to disclose every single conceivable risk from a proposed procedure." "There is no human experimental evidence that chiropractic adjustments or neck manipulations are causally related to strokes," Steinberg says. Yet, Harwe and her lawyer, Norman A. Pattis, point out that the risk of stroke has long been a concern among chiropractors. This includes professors at the University of Bridgeport College of Chiropractic, who have supported informing patients of the various potential risks from treatment.

Critics aren't saying that chiropractors shouldn't do their manipulation. They are saying patients should know that in rare cases things can go very wrong. In a letter to Matthew W. Scott, the chairman of the state Board of Chiropractic Examiners, Attorney General Richard Blumenthal notes that informed consent provides the facts to help a patient decide "whether to engage in the proposed course of therapy."

The Connecticut Medical Examining Board, in comments submitted to the Board of Chiropractic Examiners, says that disclosing the "significant risks" from adjustments to the cervical spine are a "required element of the patient's care." It's not more complicated than this. Chiropractic patients should know the risks.

They should also be told, in writing and orally, what the signs of a stroke are in the event that a problem develops later and isn't immediately recognized. This controversy has dragged on for too long. It's time for state regulators to act.

 
Connecticut News
 
March 8, 2011
Three Members of Chiropractic Board Violated Law
 
June 10, 2010
Connecticut chiropractors sued over neck manipulations
 
April 6, 2010
No harm in warning about risk
 
March 19, 2010
Board rejects warning on chiropractic risks
 
March 18, 2010
On Stroke Risks, Chiropractors Manipulate Us
 
March 17, 2010
Chiropractors Prevail in Battle Over Informed Consent
 
February 11, 2010
Chiropractic Conflict Continues in Connecticut
 
February 10, 2010
Patients Need To Know Chiropractic Risks
 
January 6, 2010
Editorial Cartoon
 
January 6, 2010
Advocates seeking state law requiring a warning prior to neck manipulation
 
January 5, 2010
Chiropractors' Argument Falls On Deaf Ears
 
January 5, 2010
Battle brews over safety of neck manipulation
 
January 5, 2010
Chiropractic Stroke Risk
 
January 4, 2010
Stroke risks prompt hearing
 
January 2, 2010
Woodbridge woman fights for warning label
 
December 29, 2009
Chiropractic Patients Should Know Risks
 
November 24, 2009
Young Mom Dies After a Chiropractic Adjustment
 
June 18, 2009
VOCA awards Preston Long, Chiropractor of the Year
 
March 3, 2008
Woman Pushes For Chiropractor Registry
 
November 2007
Stroke Victim Spreads The Word About Dangers of Chiropractic Neck Treatment
 
May 16, 2007
Chiropractic and Stroke Issues on the Rise
 
May 4, 2007
Chiropractor Malpractice Settlements To Be Public
 
May 2, 2007
A Collection of Briefs from the State Capitol
 
April 30, 2007 (MP3 File)
WTIC NewsTalk 1080
 
March 14, 2007
Tougher laws for chiropractors
 
March 13, 2007
A collection of news items from the Capitol
 
March 3, 2007
Injured patients want new rules for chiropractors
 
May 2, 1996
Proposed Law Would Affect Chiropractors