VOCA Victims of Chiropractic Abuse
No harm in warning about risk
New Haven Register, Letters to the Editor
Published: Tuesday, April 06, 2010
By Preston Long and J. William Kinsinger, M.D.
 
THE state Board of Chiropractic Examiners has voted 4-1 — four chiropractors to one public representative — not to warn patients that stroke is a rare, proven complication of chiropractic neck manipulation.

The risk has been documented in scientific literature for the past 80 years, as well as in the autopsy findings of coroners and warned about by neurologists and medical experts around the world.

The fact that hearings took place at all is a tribute to the “stroke ladies,” as one chiropractor derisively called them, led by Janet Levy and her group, Victims of Chiropractic Abuse.

The board was the jury hearing evidence, yet it in fact was on trial itself. By its questions and tactics — starting with listening to the Connecticut Chiropractic Association trying to get rid of the one public member of the board before the hearings even started and rejecting on a technicality the only chiropractor scheduled to provide testimony on behalf of the victims — the board showed its complete failure to act in the best interests of patients.

State Sen. Leonard A. Fasano, R-North Haven, testified with simplicity and courage, clearly willing to break the political bowing to chiropractors. He gave notice to the board that there will be a legislated warning. If he succeeds, the impact will extend to every state and will be a legal and political landmark.

The state Board of Medical Examiners also sided with the victims. While chiropractic witnesses played word games to suggest neck manipulation was “associated” with strokes but does not “cause” strokes, the medical doctors stated it clearly: “There is compelling circumstantial evidence.”

Yet, the chiropractic board relied entirely on a single statistical study in which no medical or chiropractic chart was examined. This is utterly amazing.

Victims attorney Jay Malcynsky pointedly asked every chiropractic witness: “What would be the harm in warning patients?”

For the patient, there obviously is only good, and no harm.

That would be true for those chiropractors who place the safety of their patients in the forefront. For them, the irony could not be greater — they would have to go against the state Board of Chiropractic Examiners, the body that is supposed to regulate standards of care in the best interests of patients, but has failed to do so. They would also have to go against their own Connecticut Chiropractic Association.

What all responsible chiropractors would support is the scientific proof of a rare, but real risk of stroke due to chiropractic neck manipulation. What they would support is giving patients the same type of informed consent regarding risks required of every medical doctor practicing in Connecticut.

It is time for the state legislature and scientific-minded chiropractors to act. Informed consent about the possibility of a stroke from neck manipulation is in everyone’s interest.

Preston Long is a chiropractor and author of “Naked Chiropractor.” The state Board of Chiropractors refused to admit his written testimony during state hearings. Write to him at 2421 E. Southern Ave., Tempe, Ariz. 85282. E-mail: plong15@gmail.com. Dr. J. William Kinsinger, an anesthesiologist, writes about health care. Write to him at 3126 S. Boulevard, No. 245, Edmond, Okla. 73013. E-mail: Kinsingerb@aol.com.



 
Connecticut News
 
March 8, 2011
Three Members of Chiropractic Board Violated Law
 
June 10, 2010
Connecticut chiropractors sued over neck manipulations
 
April 6, 2010
No harm in warning about risk
 
March 19, 2010
Board rejects warning on chiropractic risks
 
March 18, 2010
On Stroke Risks, Chiropractors Manipulate Us
 
March 17, 2010
Chiropractors Prevail in Battle Over Informed Consent
 
February 11, 2010
Chiropractic Conflict Continues in Connecticut
 
February 10, 2010
Patients Need To Know Chiropractic Risks
 
January 6, 2010
Editorial Cartoon
 
January 6, 2010
Advocates seeking state law requiring a warning prior to neck manipulation
 
January 5, 2010
Chiropractors' Argument Falls On Deaf Ears
 
January 5, 2010
Battle brews over safety of neck manipulation
 
January 5, 2010
Chiropractic Stroke Risk
 
January 4, 2010
Stroke risks prompt hearing
 
January 2, 2010
Woodbridge woman fights for warning label
 
December 29, 2009
Chiropractic Patients Should Know Risks
 
November 24, 2009
Young Mom Dies After a Chiropractic Adjustment
 
June 18, 2009
VOCA awards Preston Long, Chiropractor of the Year
 
March 3, 2008
Woman Pushes For Chiropractor Registry
 
November 2007
Stroke Victim Spreads The Word About Dangers of Chiropractic Neck Treatment
 
May 16, 2007
Chiropractic and Stroke Issues on the Rise
 
May 4, 2007
Chiropractor Malpractice Settlements To Be Public
 
May 2, 2007
A Collection of Briefs from the State Capitol
 
April 30, 2007 (MP3 File)
WTIC NewsTalk 1080
 
March 14, 2007
Tougher laws for chiropractors
 
March 13, 2007
A collection of news items from the Capitol
 
March 3, 2007
Injured patients want new rules for chiropractors
 
May 2, 1996
Proposed Law Would Affect Chiropractors